Since the last Asia-Europe People’s Forum (Hanoi 2004) we have witnessed contradictory developments in Asia as well as in Europe: on the one side the continuation of “market opening measures and financial economic considerations predominating over social ones” (Report of the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalisation), the ongoing process of liberalisation and privatisation, leading to a global restructuring of labour markets with decreasing wages, increasing informal labour and social security, the further withdrawal of the state from providing social services to all people with negative consequences for millions of people. On the other side we are witnessing growing resistance against the current form of globalisation through social movements, NGOs and trade unions all over the world. At the same time we can observe some developments which stay in sharp contrast to the official multilateral credo:

 

• Great economic powers, the EU among them, try to circumvent the problems of multilateral liberalisation through bilateral Free Trade Agreements (in case of Europe Partnership and Cooperation Agreements), which in many cases allows even more liberalisation than the WTO-agreements
• Endeavours to create regional economic agreements have gained strength, although they differ in Asia and Europe. In Asia “ASEAN + 3” is further developing plans of East Asian Economic cooperation, in Europe the enlargement of the European Union has further developed the economic space.
• At the same time we see in lots of countries a wave of protectionism or “economic patriotism” trying to prevent the buyout of enterprises which are counted as of being of national importance.

Also on the peoples’ side we observe contradictory developments: in all countries there are “winners” and “losers” of globalisation. The distribution of economic gains is unequal. Although in some countries there has been progress in poverty reduction, the situation of the poor has been worsening. That does not only describe the situation in Asia. In Europe too, the “welfare state” has been eroding and social insecurity is growing. Today there also the risk of poverty constitutes a majavascript:barre_raccourci(’’,’’,document.formulaire.texte)jor threat for large parts of the population. Within the AEPF-framework the conference provides opportunity for stocktaking of the current developments and for further discussions how we can react on these developments and promote economic and social security, including poverty reduction, health care, education, labour issues, water security etc. Which role do international organisations play in this? What people’s organisation in Asia and Europe can do to promote those developments goals, protect the interests of the vulnerable groups, farmers, migrants, people with disabilities etc.?

Monday 4 September 2006, 9.30h - 11.30h, Congress Hall, 2 ½ floor
Plenary speakers: Heidi Hautala (Finland), Achin Vanaik (India), Ramon Fernandez Duran (Spain) Chair: Laura Lodenius (Finland)

The constitution of the European Union didn’t get people’s support behind it and its future is still open. The suggestion included several aspects which would have had an impact on the structures of handling EU:s Foreign and Security policy, and the defence policy. Even though the constitution is not in place many issues from that table have been put forward in a rapid timetable.

The developing of The European Defence Agency, the urge to compete on the arms trade and arms development market with US and Asian countries and the outspoken goal that the EU member states “should increase their military spending”. Also developing of the new military crisis management tools is moving forward in very fast timetable, which many have seen as steps towards a common defence and army.